Christian Answers

Are Christians Responsible for Atrocities Done in God's Name?

0 views5 min read

Key Scriptures

"You have heard that it was said, "Love your neighbour and hate your enemy." But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you."

Matthew 5:43–44·NIV

"Jesus commanded Peter, "Put your sword away! Shall I not drink the cup the Father has given me?""

John 18:11·NIV

Advertisement

Taking the Objection Seriously

The history of violence carried out under Christian banners is real. The Crusades killed tens of thousands. The Inquisition tortured and executed people. The European wars of religion devastated entire populations. Colonialism was often conducted with missionary justification. These are not myths invented by critics — they are documented history, and Christians who dismiss them or minimise them do their faith no favours.

The question is whether these atrocities represent Christianity — or whether they represent a corruption, distortion, and outright betrayal of it.

What Jesus Actually Taught

Jesus's teaching on violence and enemies is unambiguous. In the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5–7), he instructed his followers to love their enemies, pray for those who persecute them, turn the other cheek, and make peace. When Peter drew a sword to defend Jesus at his arrest, Jesus rebuked him and healed the man Peter had struck (John 18:10–11). Jesus was executed by the state without resistance. The early church was persecuted for three centuries without raising an army.

When the Crusaders killed civilians in Jerusalem in 1099, they were not following the commands of Jesus. They were following a distorted fusion of Christian language with medieval political ambition, feudal honour culture, and papal power politics. The fact that they used Christian justifications does not make their actions Christian any more than a criminal who claims God told him to steal represents all Christians.

The No-True-Scotsman Problem — and Why It Doesn't Apply Here

Sceptics sometimes accuse Christians of a logical fallacy here: "No true Christian would do violence, therefore whoever did violence wasn't a true Christian" — which seems to define "true Christian" as whoever behaves well. This is a fair challenge, and it would apply if Christianity had no internal standard to appeal to. But Christianity does have an internal standard: the life and teaching of Jesus. The Crusaders can be evaluated against that standard — and they fail it. This is not circular reasoning; it is applying the religion's own founding documents to its adherents' behaviour.

Distinguishing the Religion from Its Misuse

Every major institution in human history has been misused by people in power. This is true of democracy, science, medicine, and education — all of which have been weaponised to oppress people at various points in history. We do not conclude that democracy is evil because Stalin manipulated elections, or that medicine is corrupt because Tuskegee experiments occurred. We evaluate the institution against its own principles.

By that standard: the same Bible that was misused to justify the Inquisition is the Bible that fuelled the abolition of slavery, the founding of hospitals and universities, the civil rights movement, and the work of figures like Dietrich Bonhoeffer who died resisting Nazi tyranny. The record is not one-sided.

The Honest Reckoning Christians Must Make

Intellectual honesty requires acknowledging that the church has sinned — sometimes grievously, sometimes institutionally, sometimes with the full involvement of its leadership. Repentance for historical wrongs is not a sign of weakness; it is a sign that the Christian standard of self-examination is being applied. Pope John Paul II formally apologised for the sins of the church against Jews, women, indigenous peoples, and others in the year 2000 — citing the Christian calling to truthfulness and repentance.

But acknowledging sin does not require accepting the claim that Christianity causes violence. The evidence suggests the opposite: the sustained reduction of violence in Western history has been driven significantly by Christian institutions and Christian ethics — the development of just war theory, the founding of the Red Cross by Henri Dunant (motivated by Christian conviction), the prohibition of torture and the concept of universal human dignity, which derives directly from the belief that every person is made in the image of God.

"You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbour and hate your enemy.' But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you." — Matthew 5:43–44 (NIV)
#crusades#inquisition#violence#history#misconceptions#apologetics#christianity#atrocities#church-history

Advertisement

Discussion

Join the discussion

Be respectful and cite Scripture where relevant. Guidelines

Please follow our community guidelines. All comments are moderated before appearing.